{"id":10,"date":"2013-08-30T15:38:04","date_gmt":"2013-08-30T13:38:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/?page_id=10"},"modified":"2015-09-16T13:08:23","modified_gmt":"2015-09-16T11:08:23","slug":"adam","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/?page_id=10","title":{"rendered":"Klip"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul>\n<li>Yanis Varoufakis: \u00bbEconomists err when they think that human rationality is all about applying one\u2019s means efficiently in order to achieve one\u2019s ends. That the efficient application of available resources in the pursuit of given objectives is an important dimension of our Reason, there is no doubt. The error however sips in when economists, and those influenced by them, assume that this is all rationality is about. This type of instrumental approach to the meaning of Reason massively underestimates perhaps the one ingredient of human reasoning that makes us exceptional animals: the capacity to subject our ends, our objectives, to rational scrutiny. To ask ourselves not just questions such as \u201cShould I invest in bonds or shares?\u201d but also questions of the type: \u201cI like X but should I like it?\u201d\u00ab <a title=\"The Refugee Crisis, Immanuel Kant And Germany\u2019s Moral Leadership\" href=\"http:\/\/www.socialeurope.eu\/2015\/09\/the-refugee-crisis-immanuel-kant-and-germanys-moral-leadership\/\" target=\"_blank\">L\u00e6s hele artiklen &#8216;The Refugee Crisis, Immanuel Kant And Germany\u2019s Moral Leadership&#8217; her<\/a><\/li>\n<li>\u00bbI en dialog med \u00f8konomiprofessoren Tito Boeri i ugemagasinet L\u2019Espresso kritiserer Piketty mainstream\u00f8konomer for at v\u00e6re verdensfjerne og mangle &#8220;et historisk og politisk perspektiv p\u00e5 kapitalismen&#8221;:\u00a0&#8220;At vide, hvem der beriger sig, hvordan de g\u00f8r det, hvor meget og med hvilken hastighed, er afg\u00f8rende i et demokrati,&#8221; mener han.\u00ab Citat fra <a href=\"http:\/\/www.information.dk\/512961\" target=\"_blank\">Mads Freses artikel &#8220;Italien er Pikettys perfekte eksempel&#8221; i Information den 18. oktober 2014<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">7. oktober 2014 publicerede Real-World Economics Review et s\u00e6rnummer om Piketty&#8217;s Capital. Blandt bidragyderne er James Galbraith, David Colander, Edward Fullbrook og Dean Baker. <\/span><a style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.paecon.net\/PAEReview\/issue69\/whole69.pdf \" target=\"_blank\">Download hele nummeret her.<\/a><\/li>\n<li>\u00bbNot only had the sense of crisis passed without any serious attempts to rectify the flaws that had nearly caused the economy to grind to a halt, but [&#8230;] the political right had emerged from the tumult stronger, unapologetic and even less restrained in its rapacity and credulity than prior to the crash.\u00ab\u00a0Phil Mirowski i\u00a0sin seneste bog <a href=\"http:\/\/www.versobooks.com\/books\/1613-never-let-a-serious-crisis-go-to-waste\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste, <\/em>New York og London, Verso 2013<\/a><\/li>\n<li>\u00bb&#8230;the dominant form of crisis response by states has been further neoliberalisation, including privatization, deregulation and austerity budgets that are eroding working class living standards\u00ab, siger Damien Cahill bl.a. i et <a title=\"Interview\" href=\"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/?p=366\" target=\"_blank\">interview i World Ec. Association Newsletter 8. september 2014<\/a><\/li>\n<li>\u00bbJeg har altid st\u00f8ttet disse studenterinitiativer, men jeg har til gode at se et positivt resultat. Jeg tror ikke, de opn\u00e5r det \u00f8nskede resultat ved at forlange et nyt pensum via de \u00f8konomiske institutter. De b\u00f8r forlange nye institutter og nye ledelser med egne budgetter, som ikke er underlagt de g\u00e6ldende disciplineringsmekanismer,\u00ab siger <a title=\"Tiden med velordnet v\u00e6kst er forbi\" href=\"http:\/\/www.information.dk\/498698\" target=\"_blank\">James Galbraith i et interviewet &#8220;Tiden med velordnet v\u00e6kst er forbi&#8221; i Information d. 26. maj 2014.<\/a><\/li>\n<li>\u00bbVi kunne jo bare lade v\u00e6re med at producere s\u00e5 meget.\u00ab <a href=\"http:\/\/politiken.dk\/debat\/debatindlaeg\/ECE2248043\/tilgiv-os-oekonomer-thi-vi-ved-ikke-hvad-vi-goer\/\" target=\"_blank\">Interview med\u00a0den tjekkiske \u00f8konom Tomas Sedlacek i Politiken (netudgaven 29. marts 2014)<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a title=\"Finansministeriets beregninger ignorerer plusserne ved velf\u00e6rden\" href=\"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/?page_id=210\">Finansministeriets beregninger ignorerer plusserne ved velf\u00e6rden, og regeringen l\u00f8ber fra sit l\u00f8fte om at neds\u00e6tte et udvalg til at udbedre det sk\u00e6ve beregningsgrundlag <\/a><\/li>\n<li><a title=\"New Paradigm Economics\" href=\"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/?page_id=166\">Redakt\u00f8ren af Real World Economics Review, Edward Fullbrook, er en af dem som \u00f8nsker et paradigmeskifte inden for \u00f8konomifaget. P\u00e5 en enkelt side i det seneste nr. af bladet kontrasterer han i ti &#8220;bullets&#8221; forskellen p\u00e5 &#8220;Old Paradigm Economics (OPE)&#8221; og &#8220;New Paradigm Economics (NPE)&#8221;. <\/a><a title=\"New Paradigm Economics\" href=\"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/?page_id=166\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/li>\n<li>&#8220;I \u00f8konomiske krisetider falder antallet af ordrer, nogle virksomheder lukker, andre fyrer folk. Men denne banale indsigt er tilsyneladende ikke sivet ind mellem \u00f8rerne p\u00e5 flertallet af den ellers h\u00f8jtuddannede flok politikere p\u00e5 Christiansborg.\u00a0<span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">De taler om arbejdsl\u00f8shed som en epidemi af dovenskab, der med uj\u00e6vne \u00e5rs mellemrum eksploderer, fordi dagpengene og kontanthj\u00e6lpen er s\u00e5 h\u00f8j, at det ikke kan betale sig at tage et lavtl\u00f8nnet arbejde.&#8221; Pia Fris Laneth i <a title=\"link til information\" href=\"http:\/\/www.information.dk\/476039\" target=\"_blank\">Information d. 23.10.13 (l\u00e6s artiklen)<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Vism\u00e6ndene mener, der b\u00e5de er behov for og r\u00e5d til at lempe finanspolitikken med omkring 5 mia. kr. mere end i regeringens forslag til finanslov for 2014.&#8221; De \u00d8konomiske R\u00e5ds formandskab i <a title=\"link til dors.dk\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dors.dk\/sw10897.asp\" target=\"_blank\">Politiken 12.10.2013 (l\u00e6s artiklen)<\/a><\/li>\n<li>&#8220;I Danmark h\u00e5ber man, at krisen g\u00e5r over af sig selv, at v\u00e6ksten vender tilbage, at huspriserne begynder stige, og dankortene kommer til at gl\u00f8de igen. Troen p\u00e5 markedet som det eneste saligg\u00f8rende ser stadig ud at v\u00e6re uanf\u00e6gtet.&#8221; &#8220;I stedet for at t\u00e6nke nyt og vision\u00e6rt pr\u00f8ver vi at bek\u00e6mpe krisen med de midler, som skabte den.&#8221; Katarina Juselius i en <a title=\"link til kronikken\" href=\"http:\/\/www.information.dk\/472717\" target=\"_blank\">kronik i Information (l\u00e6s den her)<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Regeringen bek\u00e6mper den forkerte krise! Og i stedet for krisebek\u00e6mpende politik f\u00f8rer regeringen kriseforl\u00e6ngende politik! Det skriver professor <em>J\u00f8rgen Goul Andersen<\/em> i bogen &#8220;Krisens navn&#8221; (Frydenlund 2013) <a title=\"Ny bog om dansk \u00f8konomis krise: \u201cKrisens navn\u201d\" href=\"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/?page_id=78\">&#8230;. l\u00e6s mere<\/a><\/li>\n<li>No critical mass seems to be created in opposition to what both Stiglitz and Krugman have referred to as the economic suicide of Europe, skriver \u00f8konomen<em> Erik S. Reinert<\/em> i et essay om kriseforst\u00e5else og \u00f8konomisk teori i et historisk perspektiv <a title=\"Ideer uden handling\" href=\"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/?page_id=85\">&#8230;. mere og link til essayet<\/a><\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Economics may be positively harmful for the economy&#8221;, skriver \u00f8konomiprofessor p\u00e5 Cambridge, <em>Ha-Joon Chang<\/em>, i sin kritik af troen p\u00e5 det frie markeds velsignelser: &#8220;We need different kinds of economics from freemarket economics&#8221; <a title=\"\u201c\u2026we need different kinds of economics from freemarket economics\u201d\" href=\"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/?page_id=81\">&#8230;. l\u00e6s mere<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yanis Varoufakis: \u00bbEconomists err when they think that human rationality is all about applying one\u2019s means efficiently in order to achieve one\u2019s ends. That the efficient application of available resources in the pursuit of given objectives is an important dimension of our Reason, there is no doubt. The error however sips in when economists, and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/?page_id=10\" class=\"more-link\">L\u00e6s videre <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Klip<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-10","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10"}],"version-history":[{"count":39,"href":"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":586,"href":"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10\/revisions\/586"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/netoek.dk\/w\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}